Interior design is a job and profession that currently exists and many people perform.
Jobs and work are awful especially since you cannot do anything else in most cases, especially in the states where apparently people are happy to just work and have very little vacations and wait for retirement, something completely stupid that many in europe don’t understand. The site Amerika.org has some excellent articles on this, search for “antiwork” as keyword.
Interior design is already a job, why do you say it WOULD BE in a biological-culture?
Write a book about your ideas, filling out a forum like this is silly, but not a problem to me, you can keep doing it as far as I am concerned.
Now answer to me: do you know that interior design as a job currently exists? That very wikipedia page proves it.
And it is a real job like any other, it’s not true that it is not “actual work”. You cannot do what you like, you have to fill papers, work for annoying clients, waste time and meet their horrible tastes, and if you are moral you are fucked unless by chance they are too; modern people don’t like morality. it’s a job and it’s slavery. As I said before the very idea of work and jobs should be changed, refer to Amerika.org.
And it’s hard work; is it not just because you don’t actually move the furniture in there?? In what you call a bio culture there definiteoy would not be professional interior designer; that people pay for a designer to decorate their homes is fucking ridiculous. Obviously each home owner can and should do that on his own. It is one of the most useless and charlatan professions out there. Architecture is needed, interior decorator is a fake profession for charlatans if you ask me.
On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 at 13:36, ShaunS [via CoAlpha Reactionary Forum] <[hidden email]> wrote:
I thank you for the link and will study the anti-work arguments.
Interior Design is the whole argument. To recap, the current 'system' of the western world (at least) is based on the successful Physics of the Battle Field Tank thus the state is based on the Interior Design of that Tank. There are lots of proofs: Physics based, think tanks, etc. etc. So the culture that you don't like is an implementation of the function of the Tank and being in the state (the interior of a country) is like being on the inside of a Tank. The Interior Design of the Tank becomes the Interior Design of the State.
Conversely the correct Biological implementation would be based on the interior structure of the Pregnant Woman and indeed this was used as the Interior Design of the Church. Obviously compromised by the rows of seating needed for the congregation. Thus it would need to be designed for the purpose, in fact for both purposes. If you want a culture that you do like you would need to design it and it would be Interior Design. I must assume that when the Church was the ruling power of the country that the culture at that time must have been Biological. If so then it had it's chance and it failed (which is an important aspect requiring more study).
Interior Design starts with the background of your pictures but extends all the way to a French style Revolution and the redesign of the state - which would be Interior Design. The Interior Designer is a Revolutionary!
It's not what it is now, it's whatever you want it to be. The customer can take it or leave it. If your designs are good and if your art displays them well then the ideas would be taken onboard. Draw the revolution.
The Intermediary State
This is another feature that has just emerged from the data. The Biological culture is seasonal and at it's strongest in the Summer, it would tend to some form of hibernation in the winter. As a result it does become possible to implement an intermediate culture which would be based on Biology in the Summer but revert back to the use of Physics in the Winter. The result would be a dual system.
A mechanism already exists to implement the switch from one system to the other. It's called Daylight Saving Time which is currently not an even split. When the clocks are changed we would also switch from the Biological culture of the Summer to the Physics culture of the Winter (or back again). There might also be an exodus into the countryside during the summer and a return to the cities in the winter.
The 'Duo' system would allow different laws to prevail in the Summer from those in the Winter. For example Prostitution would be legalised in the Summer but Illegal in the Winter thus the sex industry would acquire a season. This would give the winter months to allow the incubation of diseases and the infected Pro would fail the initial medical test at the start of the Biological season (or earlier) without infecting hundreds of guys in the meantime. The population would be able to compare the result of legalisation to the illegalisation and decide which is best. As a Biological function Prostitution might then be confined to the countryside rather than the cities and these are areas where the economy is poor and this profession would bring some form of economics to those regions.
The 'Duo' system could be implemented Politically (the 'Duo Party') and thus promoted legally. You would then be able to please All the people for Half of the time. The two systems would be separated by distance, so any mutually exclusive technology would be kept at a distance. Those that disagreed with the Biological culture would simply stay in the Cities, those that disagreed with the Physics culture would stay in the Countryside.
As a structure you could just go ahead and implement it within the existing legal frameworks. Doing so would allow the legal promotion of an alternative culture.
As I may have said in the past: "Just fucking do it".
However... there are of course, some primary problems to resolve.
This forum is primarily to resolve the issue of the breakdown of relationships between men and women. Not existing relationships (which still have problems) but the formation of initial relationships which has been damaged by the state and it's peculiar ideas.
The children are taught that the state will provide. The state believes that if it provides a good environment that everything will work out, but makes a wide range of mistakes. The children grow up waiting for the state to provide and they become very annoyed when it does not. People like Elliot Rodger were conned into believing in the state. The people who succeed in this world have to cheat in various ways. With a faulty system only the conman can succeed. In practice by trial and error the people learn to adopt unethical methods to circumvent the state system that obstructs their lives. The true believers eventually turn against the state (that they once believed in) and start killing people. ISIS is a classical example. Equality and gender neutral jobs hope to bring men and women into the same work place in the hope that they will mix, not remembering that this is the method of keeping them apart (such as classrooms and families). To increase the attractiveness between men and women it is better to isolate them from each other. This is unintuitive and the state falls for the mistake without looking at the history. The state follows hypothetical answers and hopes that their assumptions are correct - we call it Liberal thinking.
The Biological culture must have a mechanism to achieve relationships, it must not make the same mistake - that if the culture appears to be a good one that it will just work. Why and how, where and when, show your evidence? We cannot make the assumption that overthrowing a state and ridding ourselves of a faulty culture will result in the leftovers producing a functional alternative. The traditionalists will point to the past, we are here because it used to work, lets go back to that (Family Portrait, a Pink song). We cannot pretend like the current system does.
So... unless the answer can be found - and that is the key (that the state threw away).
The idea of course, is that male and female 'Robots' meet each other in the work place where they are an integral part of the conveyer belt. Thus from their union more 'Robots' develop by Natural Selection.
How to do the opposite?
Can you please stop writing your book here, for motherfuck’s sake? Jesus. Please. Please.
Please. Stop. It’s stupid. Realize it’s stupid.
On Sat, 2 Dec 2017 at 14:28, ShaunS [via CoAlpha Reactionary Forum] <[hidden email]> wrote:
However... there are of course, some primary problems to resolve.
And finally a schematic for the parallel universe:
|Free forum by Nabble||Edit this page|