Very good blog about the benefits of a monogamous patriarchal society

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Very good blog about the benefits of a monogamous patriarchal society

Moralmoe91
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Very good blog about the benefits of a monogamous patriarchal society

Humanity
Administrator
Great article. Liberalism fails because it believes that our old friend Human Nature can be changed. It can't, as we of Patriarchy know. What can be done, however, is to channel it. Men do have natural violent instincts. Man has an innate tendency to want to apply force to solve his problems. That will never change, but when channeled through Patriarchy, it can be made productive instead of destructive. Liberals try and try to change human nature (and most perniciously male nature) but at best they can only mask or suppress it temporarily. Doped up boys in public schools come to mind. Liberalism has a problem with reality, and that is its ultimate weakness. Failure is built in. After enough violence acts by trapped men happen, perhaps they'll cringe at what they've caused. Whether liberalism falls by force or by self-destruction, we will eventually have a chance to get back to these benefits of a monogamous, patriarchal society.

I do see one problem with the article though: it says that in a patriarchal, monogamous society, sex would be limited to marriage, thereby pushing the man to produce more for the sake of his wife. He doesn't take into account prostitution. Patriarchy must not limit male sexuality only to marriage. To do so is to punish men and would then be counterproductive. Men need to have an outlet at all times and that includes both before marriage and after marriage. (Otherwise the wife could try to increase her power by withholding sex - a feminist idea.)
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Very good blog about the benefits of a monogamous patriarchal society

Spenta
In reply to this post by Moralmoe91
I think what most modernists don't understand is that slut-like behavior is very self-destructive. And oftentimes, they discourage slut shaming because they are feminist liberals. Within less feminized cultures, there is much more of stigma against sluts. Slut shaming works because it helps to distinguish good women from bad women. What the feminists want to do is to encourage good women to be bad women and for bad women to be considered to be good women. With the conflation between slutty women and wife material women, the feminists are just grouping and categorizing all women into the ideal feminist woman rather than people as individuals.

Monogamy is ideal, but at the same time, society should separate women into who are ideal wives and women who are ideal whores and girlfriends.

A slut will always be a slut, she cannot be a good wife because there is a high risk that she will betray her husband just because he does not satisfy her sexually. Marriage today in feminist societies is such a scam for decent men to have their lives ruined by filth-ridden feminists. By discouraging prostitution, it only serves for the feminist agenda to turn all decent women into whores and to pretend all whores are decent women.

But above all, in order for a utopian society to exist, there should be a need for all men to cooperate and work on something together. Liberalism encourages strife and destruction, and therefore is not conductive to an ideal society in anyway. If people cannot agree together, then why bother cooperating, why bother even maintaining civilization? American culture is hardly the ideal culture mainly because it encourages people to destroy each other rather than to cooperate with each other.